Dussehra and my favorite character in Ramayana
Dussehra (or Vijayadashami) is a festival popularly celebrated all over India.

The story behind the festival goes like this. On this very day, Lord Rama killed Ravana to re-claim his wife Sita, who had been abducted by Ravana. This festival marks the victory of Goodness over Evil. On this day, people from all over India burn effigies of Ravana and conduct plays, popularly known as Raam Leela, which depict the entire story of how Rama fought the battle with Ravana and came back to his kingdom as a victorious king. Such plays are organised all over India. It is a must watch, if you havent seen any yet.
Speaking of Ramayana, it will be sacrilege if I do not mention my favorite character in the entire book: Devi Sita
Sita, in every sense of the word, epitomizes womanhood and all the characteristics it stands for. It is women like her, who re-instate my belief and faith in the inner strenght and power of women.
In order to give some background to the uninitiated, Sita was a princess, daughter of Bhudevi, later adopted by King Janak. When she got married to Lord Rama, he was soon sent to exile. Like a dutiful wife, she gave up the earthly comforts for a life in the woods with her husband. After that she was abducted by Ravana, who kept her in his kingdom. Rama wages war and rescues Sita from Ravana. Since Sita was kept in captivity by Ravana all this time, she had to go through the ‘Agni-Pariksha’, the test of going through the fire, in order to prove her chastity to the world. She survives that and they return to Ayodhya, the kingdom.
On reaching Ayodhya, Rama is crowned the king. He soon finds out that people of his kingdom are not ok with him living with a woman who was in another man’s household for a certain period of time. He leaves Sita and thus she is forced into her second exile. This time, she is not alone. She is pregnant and is taken into shelter by sage Valmiki. The only reason why Sita continues to live, is because she wants to hand over her sons to their father. The moment that happens, she goes back to where she came from: Mother Earth.
Now, if you mark closely, Sita, as a woman goes through all the emotions and the atrocities that women these days go through.
Despite being the queen, she attaches herself to the destiny of her husband, by willingly going with him for the 14-yr exile. A lot of women willingly go through tough times for the sake of their husbands.
She is abducted by a man who keeps her in his kingdom This is akin to all the atrocities women suffer in hands of monster-like men, who try to show their power over women by physically torturing them.
She is made to go through Agni-Pariksha to prove her chastity This is sadly the story of many women who have to go through the humiliating task of proving their chastity to the world.
She is left by her husband when there are fingers raised on her character Story of many women who are left high and dry by their husbands – for whatever reason!
Now, I have always looked up to Sita as an ideal daughter, an ideal wife and an ideal mother. According to me, she is the very epitom of patience, courage and self-respect. When she is forcedly sent on her second exile, she wants to kill herself and that is when she is reminded of her duties as a mother and that she has to unite the father with the children. At the same time, when Rama is united with his children, he begs her to come back. She refuses. This shows the strenght of the woman – she succumbed to every humiliation she was put through, but only because she had her “duties” to be fulfilled. The moment that happens, she holds her dignity high by turning down the man, who sent her away. This way she fulfills her Karma at the same time holding her head held high.
[Images: http://www.kamalkapoor.com]









hmmm..have u seen the movie lajja? there is a good dialogue scene in it when Sita is asked to go through agni pariksha.
No, I havent seen it so far… but a lot of people have recommended it. Will add it to my endless Must-Watch movie list!!
I fail to understand Ram for the way he treated Sita. I find this to be a huge flaw in the moral structure of the epic.
Anyway, if you love Sita, you should watch the movie ‘Sita Sings the Blues’ which is available here, and has been winning a lot of critical acclaim (and awards).
That is a mystery! The problem is that there are many versions of the story! Some show him in the good light, while others do not…
I saw the video – I found it offensive to our mythology. Could not appreciate the humour
As i think more about our mythology, less i like it…
Why do you not like it Sakhi?
Sita was a dignified woman she did not like the humiliation that Ram subjected her to and although he only rejected her as a queen – not as a wife, she rejects him as a husband, and tells Laxman … let me quote,
“Ram may not have rejected her as a wife but only as a queen in deference to social opinion, but Sita rejects him as a husband. In Kalidasa’s Raghuvansha, after her banishment by Ram, Sita does not address Ram as Aryaputra (a term for husband that literally translates as son of my father-in-law) but refers to him as ‘King’ instead. For instance, when Lakshman comes to her with Ram’s message, she conveys her rejection of him as her husband in the following words: “Tell the king on my behalf that even after finding me pure after the fire ordeal he had in your presence, now you have chosen to leave me because of public slander. Do you think it is befitting the noble family in which you were born?” (Kalidasa)3″
Also,
“His rejection of Sita is almost universally condemned while her rejection of him is held up as an example of supreme dignity…”
“The most powerful indictment, however, comes from the people of Mithila, the region which is the parental homeland of Sita. …
This sentiment comes through numerous folk songs of the region.”
And…
“Even today, people of Mithila avoid marrying off their daughters in Marg-Shish because that is the month Sita got married. Even today, people of Mithila do not want to marry their daughters into families living in Avadh, in fact anywhere west of Mithila.
They repeatedly recite Sita’s name in marriage songs but Ram’s name is omitted. At the end of the song there is usually one line which says “’such like Sita was married into Raghukul [the family name of Ram]‘” (Dalmia, 1986)10 .
There is a beautiful folk song of Mithila … in which a daughter tells her father what kind of a groom he should find for her. After describing various qualities she is looking for, the daughter advises her father: “Go search in the north, go south, or get me a groom from the east. But don’t go westward,” (Ram’s birthplace Ayodhya is to the West)
Sita’s strength and dignity was that she did her duty but she did not accept the injustice, if she had, she would have happily come back to Ayodhya and lived like a queen.
Lajja is a must watch!!
Thank you for your comment IHM. My comments inline
Sita was a dignified woman she did not like the humiliation that Ram subjected her to and although he only rejected her as a queen – not as a wife, she rejects him as a husband, and tells Laxman … let me quote,
“Ram may not have rejected her as a wife but only as a queen in deference to social opinion, but Sita rejects him as a husband. In Kalidasa’s Raghuvansha, after her banishment by Ram, Sita does not address Ram as Aryaputra (a term for husband that literally translates as son of my father-in-law) but refers to him as ‘King’ instead. For instance, when Lakshman comes to her with Ram’s message, she conveys her rejection of him as her husband in the following words: “Tell the king on my behalf that even after finding me pure after the fire ordeal he had in your presence, now you have chosen to leave me because of public slander. Do you think it is befitting the noble family in which you were born?” (Kalidasa)3″
Also,
“His rejection of Sita is almost universally condemned while her rejection of him is held up as an example of supreme dignity…”
I am in awe of Sita’s personality. She knew what her karma was and she stuck to it. All at the same time, keeping her dignity intact! Had she gone back to Rama, it would have been a good end to the story… because finally you feel sorry for her!! For no fault of hers, she had to bear the brunt! And sadly, Lord Rama was the one making her go through it…
“The most powerful indictment, however, comes from the people of Mithila, the region which is the parental homeland of Sita. …
This sentiment comes through numerous folk songs of the region.”
And…
“Even today, people of Mithila avoid marrying off their daughters in Marg-Shish because that is the month Sita got married. Even today, people of Mithila do not want to marry their daughters into families living in Avadh, in fact anywhere west of Mithila.
They repeatedly recite Sita’s name in marriage songs but Ram’s name is omitted. At the end of the song there is usually one line which says “’such like Sita was married into Raghukul [the family name of Ram]‘” (Dalmia, 1986)10 .
There is a beautiful folk song of Mithila … in which a daughter tells her father what kind of a groom he should find for her. After describing various qualities she is looking for, the daughter advises her father: “Go search in the north, go south, or get me a groom from the east. But don’t go westward,” (Ram’s birthplace Ayodhya is to the West)
You know, as much as I admire Sita… I can not make myself loathe Lord Rama. After all, he was the ideal son, the ideal brother, the ideal king… and somehow his duty as a king preceded his duty as the husband! That was of more priority. Even when he sent away Sita, he did not re-marry and he was in as much pain as she was! He could not live a peaceful life after that… I am not explaining his actions. I am just saying that let us not be judgemental of him and write him off totally, like the people of Mithila are doing.
Sita’s strength and dignity was that she did her duty but she did not accept the injustice, if she had, she would have happily come back to Ayodhya and lived like a queen.
Lajja is a must watch!!
I cant wait to see that..
I think I would choose lakshmana as my fav char, for his immense trust and faith in his brother’s goodness. I think its a little too idealistic, even more than the ever so ideal man Ram
Thats a good take on Ramayana
I love the character of Lakshman too